|
|
Post by kharmakazy on Feb 22, 2006 2:00:46 GMT 1
I searched but couldn't find the answer, so I figured I'd ask.
I have a tungsten T2. I have installed the program, as well as UDMH and warpspeed and the memunfragmenter.
I put some nes games on the SD card to test and they worked fine.. (GREAT actually). SO I figured I would check another system so I put some roms in the other folders..
Now it will still play nes games.. but if I attempt to change the system in the browser it freezes or resets.
I tried uninstalling the whole shebang and trying again, no luck so far. Now it resets whenever I run the program, after telling me how stable it is.
What am I missing?
|
|
|
|
Post by kharmakazy on Feb 22, 2006 3:59:17 GMT 1
Belay that order.
Seems some sort of voodoo occurred between the 19th and 20th time I wiped my palm.. and it seems that it wants to work now.
Snes emu is kind of slow but playable.
Good work, great stuff.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tinnus on Feb 22, 2006 17:09:13 GMT 1
General launcher unstability. Fixed in next version.
|
|
|
|
Post by kharmakazy on Feb 24, 2006 1:46:28 GMT 1
Is there any chance that the emulation will speed up at all in the later versions, or is that entirely a hardware issue? I'm interested because my tungsten T2 is not exactly state of the art anymore. The NES and GB/GBC emu seems to be running flawlessly after a small amount of voodoo. Gens and SNES are just a tad bit below playable on my device I find. Warpspeed alleviates this to some extent.. but I am not sure what the safe range is for overclocking this thing.. and would hate to fry my toy.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tinnus on Feb 24, 2006 14:38:20 GMT 1
192MHz in most cases (same CPU as T|E right?). The wrost you could do is hard reset, even if you went to something crazy like 300MHz. If 192 is too unstable, use 180.
|
|
|
|
Post by kharmakazy on Feb 24, 2006 19:56:47 GMT 1
Thanks for the info. I have yet to find anything on the subject on line so I do appreciate it.
|
|
|
|
Post by countbuggula on Feb 24, 2006 21:29:43 GMT 1
192MHz in most cases (same CPU as T|E right?). The wrost you could do is hard reset, even if you went to something crazy like 300MHz. If 192 is too unstable, use 180. Huh, interesting. I don't know if it's the same CPU but I get the exact results with my Treo 600. 192 works best, but is unstable (takes me 3 or 4 times to get it to run with the touchscreen working without crashing). Once it's running though it's flawless. NES and GBC w/sound are a tiny bit choppy but silk w/o sound, SNES is playable but a bit choppy still w/o sound - but hey it's a 600 so I'm happy SNES works at all. I've been keeping LJP at 192 for some time now with no problems. |
|
|
|
Post by mavsman4457 on Feb 26, 2006 5:32:26 GMT 1
what is the best device to use for speed?
|
|
pavla
New Member
Posts: 20
|
Post by pavla on Feb 26, 2006 12:02:21 GMT 1
The tungsten T5 has quite a high speed (416Mhz), but the TX uses the same processor (although at 330Mhz) so can be overclocked to the same speed. The Tungsten C has a fast processor too (400 MHz) so is a candidate too.
Further is important the amount of heap memory, the Zodiac has a lot of that memory so (I believe) can run without the UDMH application, as has the Tungsten T3 i thought.
Correct me if i'm wrong.
|
|
|
|
Post by angel on Feb 26, 2006 12:59:30 GMT 1
So far i tested warpspeed on my new TX to raise it to my T5 speed (416mhz).
In but a move, with 0 frameskip i gain :
1 frame/s at the title screen (33->34)
4 frame/s ingame (24->28)
Not sure it worth it, i'll wait for tinnus releasing PS1 or *** and test if it really needs to be overclocked, considering i dont like overclocking.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tinnus on Feb 26, 2006 14:47:32 GMT 1
angel, both the T5 and the TX can go to 614 MHz (IIRC) without problems. The most you can get is a hard reset... and little battery life ;D
Dunno if you know, but dmitry once clocked his TX to 700MHz or something around it.
|
|
|
|
Post by angel on Feb 26, 2006 16:45:52 GMT 1
What are your stable setting for 614 ? i tried one time, but i have only white screen when launching ljp...
|
|
|
|
Post by Tinnus on Feb 26, 2006 17:13:34 GMT 1
Hmm, I don't know, I've only read reports on that. But you could try going down slowly, like 608, 600, 592, etc until it works OK.
|
|
|
|
Post by angel on Feb 26, 2006 17:51:27 GMT 1
At 552 mhz i obtain decent results (37 frame / second ingame without smoothing). But with auto frameskip i have very decent results and playable games too.
I'll wait the psx and *** results before throwing my money in this app, i prefer to donate to people like you, squeezix, yoyo, metaview and co... for applications i use.
|
|
|
|
Post by _Em on Feb 27, 2006 3:52:09 GMT 1
On my TX, I tend to overclock to 520MHz for LJP and TCPMP when needed. I found 552MHz to be hit-and-miss in stability for me. However, on these processors, you don't really have to worry about "overclocking". The XScale CPUs used are usually rated for either 624MHz or 520MHz -- you don't know which one you've got until you try. With the TX, Palm cut the CPU speed in half to cut down on power consumption.
These processors are actually designed to ramp up and down as needed, so that your CPU is only cycling as fast as the current process requires. However, PalmOS doesn't take advantage of this, and uses the processor in a fixed mode setting. Another example of the hardware in Palm devices being much more capable than how Palm has used it.
|
|
